Tuesday, July 31, 2007

Atomic absorption spectroscopy

Atomic absorption spectroscopy
is a technique for determining the concentration of a particular metal element in a sample. Atomic absorption spectroscopy can be used to analyse the concentration of over 62 different metals in a solution.

The technique typically makes use of a flame to atomize the sample, but other atomizers such as a graphite furnace are also used. Three steps are involved in turning a liquid sample into an atomic gas:

- Desolvation – the liquid solvent is evaporated, and the dry sample remains
- Vaporisation – the solid sample vaporises to a gas
- Volatilisation – the compounds making up the sample are broken into free atoms.

The flame is arranged such that it is laterally long (usually 10cm) and not deep. The height of the flame must also be monitored by controlling the flow of the fuel mixture. A beam of light passes through this flame at its longest axis (the lateral axis) and hits a detector.

The light that is focused into the flame is produced by a hollow cathode lamp. Inside the lamp is a cylindrical metal cathode containing the metal for excitation, and an anode. When a high voltage is applied across the anode and cathode, the metal atoms in the cathode are excited into producing light with a certain emission spectra. The type of hollow cathode tube depends on the metal being analysed.
For analysing the concentration of copper in an ore, a copper cathode tube would be used, and likewise for any other metal being analysed. The electrons of the atoms in the flame can be promoted to higher orbitals for an instant by absorbing a set quantity of energy (a quantum).
This amount of energy is specific to a particular electron transition in a particular element. As the quantity of energy put into the flame is known, and the quantity remaining at the other side (at the detector) can be measured, it is possible to calculate how many of these transitions took place, and thus get a signal that is proportional to the concentration of the element being measured.

Enzyme Immunoassay (Add-on)

Agglutination

is the clumping of particles. The word agglutination comes from the Latin agglutinare, "to glue to."

This occurs in biology in three main examples:

1. The clumping of cells such as bacteria or red blood cells, in the presence of an antibody. The antibody or other molecule binding with multiple particles, and joining them.

2. The coalescing of small particles that are suspended in solution; these larger masses are then (usually) precipitated.

3. An allergic reaction type occurrence where cells become more compacted together to prevent foreign materials entering them. This is usually the result of an antigen in the vicinity of the cells.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agglutination_(biology)

How Genetic Modified Food came abt!


Labeled probe


Toxicology analysis

Dose-response relationship
describes the change in effect on an organism caused by differing levels of exposure (or doses) to a stressor (usually a chemical). This may apply to individuals (eg: a small amount has no observable effect, a large amount is fatal), or to populations (eg: how many people are affected at different levels of exposure).

Studying dose response, and developing dose response models, is central to determining "safe" and "hazardous" levels and dosages for drugs, potential pollutants, and other substances that humans are exposed to. These conclusions are often the basis for public policy.
When the agent is radiation instead of a drug, this is called the exposure-response relationship.

Dose-response curve

A dose-response curve is a simple X-Y graph relating the magnitude of a stressor (e.g. concentration of a pollutant, amount of a drug, temperature, intensity of radiation) to the response of the receptor (e.g. organism under study). The response is usually death (mortality), but other effects (or endpoints) can be studied.

The measured dose (usually in milligrams, micrograms, or grams per kilogram of body-weight) is generally plotted on the X axis and the response is plotted on the Y axis. Commonly, it is the logarithm of the dose that is plotted on the X axis, and in such cases the curve is typically sigmoidal, with the steepest portion in the middle.

The first point along the graph where a response above zero is reached is usually referred to as a threshold-dose. For most beneficial or recreational drugs, the desired effects are found at doses slightly greater than the threshold dose. At higher doses still, undesired side effects appear and grow stronger as the dose increases.
The stronger a particular substance is, the steeper this curve will be. In quantitative situations, the Y-axis usually is designated by percentages, which refer to the percentage of users registering a standard response (which is often death, when the 50% mark refers to LD50). Such a curve is referred to as a quantal dose response curve, destinguishing it from a graded dose response curve, where response is continuous.

Problems exist regarding non-linear relationships between dose and response, thresholds reached and 'all-or-nothing' responses. These inconsistencies can challenge the validity of judging causality solely by the strength or presence of a dose-response relationship.
lethal dose (LD)
is an indication of the lethality of a given substance or type of radiation. Because resistance varies from one individual to another, the 'lethal dose' represents a dose (usually recorded as dose per kilogram of subject body weight) at which a given percentage of subjects will die.
The most commonly-used lethality indicator is the LD50 (or LD50), a dose at which 50% of subjects will die. LD measurements are often used to describe the power of venoms in animals such as snakes.

Animal-based LD measurements are a commonly-used technique in drug research, although many researchers are now shifting away from such methods.

LD figures depend not only on the species of animal, but also on the mode of administration. For instance, a toxic substance inhaled or injected into the bloodstream may require a much smaller dosage than if the same substance is swallowed.

LD values for humans are generally estimated by extrapolating results from testing on animals or on human cell cultures. One common form of extrapolation involves measuring LD on animals like mice or dogs, converting to dosage per kilogram of biomass, and extrapolating to human norms.
While animal-extrapolated LD values are correlated to lethality in humans, the degree of error is sometimes very large. The biology of test animals, while similar to that of humans in many respects, sometimes differs in important aspects.
For instance, mouse tissue is approximately fifty times less responsive than human tissue to the venom of the Sydney funnelweb. The square-cube law can also complicate the scaling relationships involved.

Currently, the only known LD50 values obtained directly on humans are from Nazi human experimentation
Acceptable Daily Intake
or - ADI is a measure of the amount a specific substance (usually a food additive, or a residue of a veterinary drug or pesticide) in food or drinking water that can be ingested (orally) over a lifetime without an appreciable health risk. ADIs are expressed by body mass, usually in milligrams (of the substance) per kilograms of body mass per day.

This concept was first introduced in 1957 by the Council of Europe and later the Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), a committee maintained by two United Nations bodies: the Food and Agriculture Organization FAO and the WHO World Health Organization.

An ADI value is based on current research, with long-term studies on animals and observations of humans. First, a No Observable (Adverse) Effect Level, the amount of a substance that shows no toxic effects, is determined on the basis of studies intended to measure an effect at several doses.
Usually the studies are performed with several doses including high doses. In case there are several studies on different effects, it is usually taken the lowest NO(A)EL.
Then, the NOEL (or NOAEL) is scaled by a safety factor, conventionally 100, to account for the differences between test animals and humans (factor of 10) and possible differences in sensitivity between humans (another factor of 10). The ADI is usually given in mg per kg body weight per day. Note that the ADI is considered a safe intake level for the healthy adult of normal weight who consumes in average daily the amount of the substance in question.

The higher the ADI, the "safer" for regular ingestion is a compound.

The ADI concept can be understood as a measure to indicate the toxicity from long-term exposure to repeated ingestion of chemical compounds in foods (present and/or added), as opposed to acute toxicity.

Detection method for GM food

The detection of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in food or feed is possible by biochemical means. It can either be qualitative, showing which GMO is present, or quantitative, measuring in which amount a certain GMO is present. Being able to detect a GMO is an important part of food safety, as without detection methods the traceability of GMOs would rely solely on documentation.
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a biochemistry and molecular biology technique for isolating and exponentially amplifying a fragment of DNA, via enzymatic replication, without using a living organism. It enables the detection of specific strands of DNA by making millions of copies of a target genetic sequence. The target sequence is essentially photocopied at an exponential rate, and simple visualisation techniques can make the millions of copies easy to see.
The method works by pairing the targeted genetic sequence with custom designed complimentary bits of DNA called primers. In the presence of the target sequence, the primers match with it and trigger a chain reaction. DNA replication enzymes use the primers as docking points and start doubling the target sequences. The process is repeated over and over again by sequential heating and cooling until doubling and redoubling has multiplied the target sequence several million-fold. The millions of identical fragments are then purified in a slab of gel, dyed, and can be seen with UV light.

Quantitative detection

Quantitative PCR (Q-PCR) is used to measure the quantity of a PCR product (preferably real-time, QRT-PCR). It is the method of choice to quantitatively measure amounts of transgene DNA in a food or feed sample. Q-PCR is commonly used to determine whether a DNA sequence is present in a sample and the number of its copies in the sample. The method with currently the highest level of accuracy is quantitative real-time PCR. QRT-PCR methods use fluorescent dyes, such as Sybr Green, or fluorophore-containing DNA probes, such as TaqMan, to measure the amount of amplified product in real time. If the targeted genetic sequence is unique to a certain GMO, a positive PCR test proves that the GMO is present in the sample.

Qualitative detection

Whether or not a GMO is present in a sample can be tested by Q-PCR, but also by multiplex PCR. Multiplex PCR uses multiple, unique primer sets within a single PCR reaction to produce amplicons of varying sizes specific to different DNA sequences, i.e. different transgenes. By targeting multiple genes at once, additional information may be gained from a single test run that otherwise would require several times the reagents and more time to perform. Annealing temperatures for each of the primer sets must be optimized to work correctly within a single reaction, and amplicon sizes, i.e., their base pair length, should be different enough to form distinct bands when visualized by gel electrophoresis.
Near infrared fluorescence (NIR)

Near infrared fluorescence (NIR) detection is a method that can reveal what kinds of chemicals are present in a sample based on their physical properties. By hitting a sample with near infrared light, chemical bonds in the sample vibrate and re-release the light energy at a wavelength characteristic for a specific molecule or chemical bond. It is not yet known if the differences between GMOs and conventional plants are large enough to detect with NIR imaging. Although the technique would require advanced machinery and data processing tools, a non-chemical approach could have some advantages such as lower costs and enhanced speed and mobility.

Identification of Foodborne Pathogen

The Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay, or ELISA,
is a biochemical technique used mainly in immunology to detect the presence of an antibody or an antigen in a sample. The ELISA has been used as a diagnostic tool in medicine and plant pathology, as well as a quality control check in various industries. Performing an ELISA involves at least one antibody with specificity for a particular antigen. The sample with an unknown amount of antigen is immobilized on a solid support (usually a polystyrene microtiter plate) either non-specifically (via adsorption to the surface) or specifically (via capture by another antibody specific to the same antigen, in a "sandwich" ELISA). After the antigen is immobilized the detection antibody is added, forming a complex with the antigen. The detection antibody can be covalently linked to an enzyme, or can itself be detected by a secondary antibody which is linked to an enzyme through bioconjugation. Between each step the plate is typically washed with a mild detergent solution to remove any proteins or antibodies that are not specifically bound. After the final wash step the plate is developed by adding an enzymatic substrate to produce a visible signal, which indicates the quantity of antigen in the sample. Older ELISAs utilize chromogenic substrates, though newer assays employ fluorogenic substrates with much higher sensitivity. In simple terms, an unknown amount of antigen in a sample is immobilized on a surface. One then washes a particular antibody over the surface. This antibody is linked to an enzyme that visibly reacts when activated, say by light hitting it in the case of a fluorescent enzyme; the brightness of the fluorescence would then tell you how much antigen is in your sample.

The Enzyme ImmunoAssay (EIA) is a synonym for the ELISA.

Application of ELISA

Because the ELISA can be performed to evaluate either the presence of antigen or the presence of antibody in a sample, it is a useful tool both for determining serum antibody concentrations (such as with the HIV test[1] or West Nile Virus) and also for detecting the presence of antigen. It has also found applications in the food industry in detecting potential food allergens such as milk, peanuts, walnuts, almonds, and eggs.
Methods

The steps of the general, "indirect," ELISA for determining serum antibody concentrations are:
Apply a sample of known antigen to a surface, often the well of a
microtiter plate. The antigen is fixed to the surface to render it immobile. Simple adsorption of the protein to the plastic surface is usually sufficient. These samples of known antigen concentrations will constitute a standard curve used to calculate antigen concentrations of unknown samples. Note that the antigen itself may be an antibody.

The plate wells or other surface are then coated with serum samples of unknown antigen concentration, diluted into the same buffer used for the antigen standards. Since antigen immobilization in this step is due to non-specific adsorption, it is important for the total protein concentration to be similar to that of the antigen standards.

A concentrated solution of non-interacting protein, such as Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) or casein, is added to all plate wells. This step is known as blocking, because the serum proteins block non-specific adsorption of other proteins to the plate.

The plate is washed, and a detection antibody specific to the antigen of interest is applied to all plate wells. This antibody will only bind to immobilized antigen on the well surface, not to other serum proteins or the blocking proteins.

The plate is washed to remove any unbound detection antibody. After this wash, only the antibody-antigen complexes remain attached to the well.

Secondary antibodies, which will bind to any remaining detection antibodies, are added to the wells. These secondary antibodies are conjugated to the substrate-specific enzyme. This step may be skipped if the detection antibody is conjugated to an enzyme.

Wash the plate, so that excess unbound enzyme-antibody conjugates are removed.
Apply a substrate which is converted by the enzyme to elicit a chromogenic or fluorogenic signal.
View/quantify the result using a spectrophotometer, spectrofluorometer, or other optical device.

The enzyme acts as an amplifier; even if only few enzyme-linked antibodies remain bound, the enzyme molecules will produce many signal molecules. A major disadvantage of the indirect ELISA is that the method of antigen immobilization is non-specific; any proteins in the sample will stick to the microtiter plate well, so small concentrations of analyte in serum must compete with other serum proteins when binding to the well surface. The sandwich ELISA provides a solution to this problem.

ELISA may be run in a qualitative or quantitative format. Qualitative results provide a simple positive or negative result for a sample. The cutoff between positive and negative is determined by the analyst and may be statistical. Two or three times the standard deviation is often used to distinguish positive and negative samples. In quantitative ELISA, the optical density or fluorescent units of the sample is interpolated into a standard curve, which is typically a serial dilution of the target.

Analytical methods for detection of hazards

Chromatography
is the collective term for a family of laboratory techniques for the separation of mixtures. It involves passing a mixture dissolved in a "mobile phase" through a stationary phase, which separates the analyte to be measured from other molecules in the mixture and allows it to be isolated.

Chromatography may be preparative or analytical. Preparative chromatography seeks to separate the components of a mixture for further use (and is thus a form of purification). Analytical chromatography normally operates with smaller amounts of material and seeks to measure the relative proportions of analytes in a mixture. The two are not mutually exclusive.
DNA electrophoresis
is an analytical technique used to separate DNA fragments by size. An electric field forces the fragments to migrate through a gel. DNA molecules normally migrate from negative to positive potential due to the net negative charge of the phosphate backbone of the DNA chain. At the scale of the length of DNA molecules, the gel looks much like a random, intricate network.
Longer molecules migrate more slowly because they are more easily 'trapped' in the network.
After the separation is completed, the fractions of DNA fragments of different length are often visualized using a fluorescent dye specific for DNA, such as ethidium bromide. The gel shows bands corresponding to different DNA molecules populations with different molecular weight. Fragment size is usually reported in "nucleotides", "base pairs" or "kb" (for 1000's of base pairs) depending upon whether single- or double-stranded DNA has been separated. Fragment size determination is typically done by comparison to commercially available DNA ladders containing linear DNA fragments of known length.

The types of gel most commonly used for DNA electrophoresis are agarose (for relatively long DNA molecules) and polyacrylamide (for high resolution of short DNA molecules, for example in DNA sequencing). Gels have conventionally been run in a "slab" format such as that shown in the figure, but capillary electrophoresis has become important for applications such as high-throughput DNA sequencing. Electrophoresis techniques used in the assessment of DNA damage include alkaline gel electrophoresis and pulsed field gel electrophoresis. The measurement and analysis are mostly done with a specialized gel analysis software. Capillary electrophoresis results are typically displayed in a trace view called an electropherogram.
The DNA strand is cut into smaller fragments using DNA endonuclease, then samples of the DNA solution (DNA sample and buffer) is placed in the wells of the gel, and allowed to run for some time (the less the voltage of the electophoresis, te longer time for the DNA sample to run through the gel, and this results in a more accurate separation). method for DNA electrophoresis

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_electrophoresis

How are GM foods regulated and what is the government's role in this process?
Governments around the world are hard at work to establish a regulatory process to monitor the effects of and approve new varieties of GM plants. Yet depending on the political, social and economic climate within a region or country, different governments are responding in different ways.
In Japan, the Ministry of Health and Welfare has announced that health testing of GM foods will be mandatory as of April 2001. Currently, testing of GM foods is voluntary. Japanese supermarkets are offering both GM foods and unmodified foods, and customers are beginning to show a strong preference for unmodified fruits and vegetables.
India's government has not yet announced a policy on GM foods because no GM crops are grown in India and no products are commercially available in supermarkets yet. India is, however, very supportive of transgenic plant research. It is highly likely that India will decide that the benefits of GM foods outweigh the risks because Indian agriculture will need to adopt drastic new measures to counteract the country's endemic poverty and feed its exploding population.
Some states in Brazil have banned GM crops entirely, and the Brazilian Institute for the Defense of Consumers, in collaboration with Greenpeace, has filed suit to prevent the importation of GM crops. Brazilian farmers, however, have resorted to smuggling GM soybean seeds into the country because they fear economic harm if they are unable to compete in the global marketplace with other grain-exporting countries.
In Europe, anti-GM food protestors have been especially active. In the last few years Europe has experienced two major foods scares: bovine spongiform encephalopathy (mad cow disease) in Great Britain and dioxin-tainted food originating from Belgium. These food scares have undermined consumer confidence about the European food supply, and citizens are disinclined to trust government information about GM foods.In response to the public outcry, Europe now requires mandatory food labeling of GM foods in stores, and the European Commission (EC) has established a 1% threshold for contamination of unmodified foods with GM food products.
In the United States, the regulatory process is confused because there are three different government agencies that have jurisdiction over GM foods. To put it very simply, the EPA evaluates GM plants for environmental safety, the USDA evaluates whether the plant is safe to grow, and the FDA evaluates whether the plant is safe to eat.
The EPA conducts risk assessment studies on pesticides that could potentially cause harm to human health and the environment, and establishes tolerance and residue levels for pesticides. There are strict limits on the amount of pesticides that may be applied to crops during growth and production, as well as the amount that remains in the food after processing.
Growers using pesticides musthave a license for each pesticide and must follow the directions on the label to accord with the EPA's safety standards. Government inspectors may periodically visit farms and conduct investigations to ensure compliance.
Violation of government regulations may result in steep fines, loss of license and even jail sentences.As an example the EPA regulatory approach, consider B.t. corn. The EPA has not established limits on residue levels in B.t corn because the B.t. in the corn is not sprayed as a chemical pesticide but is a gene that is integrated into the genetic material of the corn itself.
Growers must have a license from the EPA for B.t corn, and the EPA has issued a letter for the 2000 growing season requiring farmers to plant 20% unmodified corn, and up to 50% unmodified corn in regions where cotton is also cultivated. This planting strategy may help prevent insects from developing resistance to the B.t. pesticides as well as provide a refuge for non-target insects such as Monarch butterflies.
The USDA has many internal divisions that share responsibility for assessing GM foods. Among these divisions are APHIS, the Animal Health and Plant Inspection Service, which conducts field tests and issues permits to grow GM crops, the Agricultural Research Service which performs in-house GM food research, and the Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service which oversees the USDA risk assessment program.
The USDA is concerned with potential hazards of the plant itself. Does it harbor insect pests? Is it a noxious weed? Will it cause harm to indigenous species if it escapes from farmer's fields? The USDA has the power to impose quarantines on problem regions to prevent movement of suspected plants, restrict import or export of suspected plants, and can even destroy plants cultivated in violation of USDA regulations.
Many GM plants do not require USDA permits from APHIS.
A GM plant does not require a permit if it meets these 6 criteria:

1) the plant is nota noxious weed;
2) the genetic material introduced into the GM plant is stably integrated into the plant's own genome;
3) the function of the introduced gene is known and does not cause plant disease;
4) the GM plant is not toxic to non-target organisms;
5) the introduced gene will not cause the creation of new plant viruses; and
6) the GM plant cannot contain genetic material from animal or human pathogens (see http://www.aphis.usda.gov/bbep/bp/7cfr340.html).
The current FDA policy was developed in 1992 (Federal Register Docket No. 92N-0139) and states that agri-biotech companies may voluntarily ask the FDA for a consultation. Companies working to create new GM foods are not required to consult the FDA, nor are they required to follow the FDA's recommendations after the consultation.
Consumer interest groups wish this process to be mandatory, so that all GM food products, whole foods or otherwise, must be approved by the FDA before being released for commercialization. The FDA counters that the agency currently does not have the time, money, or resources to carry out exhaustive health and safety studies of every proposed GM food product. Moreover, the FDA policy as it exists today does not allow for this type of intervention.
How are GM foods labeled?
Labeling of GM foods and food products is also a contentious issue.
On the whole, agribusiness industries believe that labeling should be voluntary and influenced by the demands of the free market.
If consumers show preference for labeled foods over non-labeled foods, then industry will have the incentive to regulate itself or risk alienating the customer. Consumer interest groups, on the other hand, are demanding mandatory labeling.
People have the right to know what they are eating, argue the interest groups, and historically industry has proven itself to be unreliable at self-compliance with existing safety regulations.
The FDA's current position on food labeling is governed by the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act which is only concerned with food additives, not whole foods or food products that are considered "GRAS" - generally recognized as safe.
The FDA contends that GM foods are substantially equivalent to non-GM foods, and therefore not subject to more stringent labeling. If all GM foods and food products are to be labeled, Congress must enact sweeping changes in the existing food labeling policy.
There are many questions that must be answered if labeling of GM foods becomes mandatory.
First, are consumers willing to absorb the cost of such an initiative?
If the food production industry is required to label GM foods, factories will need to construct two separate processing streams and monitor the production lines accordingly. Farmers must be able to keep GM crops and non-GM crops from mixing during planting, harvesting and shipping. It is almost assured that industry will pass along these additional costs to consumers in the form of higher prices.
Secondly, what are the acceptable limits of GM contamination in non-GM products?
The EC has determined that 1% is an acceptable limit of cross-contamination, yet many consumer interest groups argue that only 0% is acceptable. Some companies such as Gerber baby foods and Frito-Lay have pledged to avoid use of GM foods in any of their products. But who is going to monitor these companies for compliance and what is the penalty if they fail?
Once again, the FDA does not have the resources to carry out testing to ensure compliance.What is the level of detectability of GM food cross-contamination? Scientists agree that current technology is unable to detect minute quantities of contamination, so ensuring 0% contamination using existing methodologies is not guaranteed. Yet researchers disagree on what level of contamination really is detectable, especially in highly processed food products such as vegetable oils or breakfast cereals where the vegetables used to make these products have been pooled from many different sources.
A 1% threshold may already be below current levels of detectability.
Finally, who is to be responsible for educating the public about GM food labels and how costly will that education be?
Food labels must be designed to clearly convey accurate information about the product in simple language that everyone can understand. This may be the greatest challenge faced be a new food labeling policy: how to educate and inform the public without damaging the public trust and causing alarm or fear of GM food products.
In January 2000, an international trade agreement for labeling GM foods was established. More than 130 countries, including the US, the world's largest producer of GM foods, signed the agreement. The policy states that exporters must be required to label all GM foods and that importing countries have the right to judge for themselves the potential risks and reject GM foods, if they so choose. This new agreement may spur the U.S. government to resolve the domestic food labeling dilemma more rapidly.

GM food & its benefits

GM FOOD Nutritional enhancement
Genetic engineering can also be used to increase the amount of particular nutrients (like vitamins) in food crops. Research into this technique, sometimes called ‘nutritional enhancement’, is now at an advanced stage.
Researchers are especially looking at major health problems like iron and vitamin A deficiency. The removal of the protein in peanuts that causes allergies in some people is also being researched.
Benefits of GM foods
There is a need to produce inexpensive, safe and nutritious foods to help feed the world’s growing population.
Genetic modification may provide:

- Better quality food
- Higher nutritional yields
- Inexpensive and nutritious food, like carrots with more antioxidants
- Foods with a greater shelf life, like tomatoes that taste better and last longer
- Food with medicinal benefits, such as edible vaccines - for example, bananas with bacterial or rotavirus antigens
- Crops and produce that require less chemical application, such as herbicide resistant canola.
Advocates argue that GM foods are potentially better for the environment.
By using genetically engineered crops that are resistant to attack by pests or disease, farmers and primary producers do not have to apply large amounts of pesticides and chemicals to the surrounding environment.
Developing crops that are resistant to particular herbicides and pesticides may reduce the amount of pesticides used in food production and the residual pesticide levels in the environment.
The risks of genetically modified crops
Food regulatory authorities require that GM foods receive individual pre-market safety assessments. Also, the principle of ‘substantial equivalence’ is used. This means that an existing food is compared with its genetically modified counterpart to find any differences between the existing food and the new product. The assessment investigates:
- Toxicity (using similar methods to those used for conventional foods)
- Tendency to provoke any allergic reaction
- Stability of the inserted gene
-
Whether there is any nutritional deficit or change in the GM food
- Any other unintended effects of the gene insertion.
A GM food will only be approved for sale if it is safe and is as nutritious as its conventional counterparts. The safety of GM foods is still being debated, as it is impossible to predict all of the potential effects on human health and the environment.
Some public health experts, however, advocate caution and believe that ‘we are only at the "scientific starting line", we simply don’t know whether GM foods are safe’. Stephen Leeder, ‘Genetically modified foods - food for thought’, MJA http://www.mja.com.au/
Some concerns that have been raised by scientists, community groups and members of the public include:

New allergens could be inadvertently created - known allergens could be transferred from traditional foods into GM foods. For instance, during laboratory testing, a gene from the Brazil nut was introduced into soybeans. It was found that people with allergies to Brazil nuts could also be allergic to soybeans that had been genetically modified in this way. No allergic effects have been found with currently approved GM foods.

Antibiotic resistance may develop - bioengineers sometimes insert a ‘marker’ gene to help them identify whether a new gene has been successfully introduced to the host DNA. One such marker gene is for resistance to particular antibiotics. If genes coded for such resistance enter the food chain and are taken up by human gut microflora, the effectiveness of antibiotics could be reduced and human infectious disease risk increased. Research has shown that the risk is very low; however, there is general agreement that use of these markers should be phased out. Stephen Leeder, ‘Genetically modified foods - food for thought’, MJA www.mja.com.au, John Huppatz and Paula A Fitzgerald, MJA 2000

Cross-breeding - other risks include the potential for cross-breeding between GM crops and surrounding vegetation, including weeds. This could result in weeds that are resistant to herbicides and would thus require a greater use of herbicides, which could lead to soil and water contamination. The environmental safety aspects of GM crops vary considerably according to local conditions.

Pesticide resistant insects - the genetic modification of some crops to permanently produce the natural biopesticide Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxin could encourage the evolution of Bt-resistant insects, rendering the spray ineffective. Wherever pesticides are used, insect resistance can occur and good agricultural practice includes strategies to minimise this.
Biodiversity - growing GM crops on a large scale may also have implications for biodiversity, the balance of wildlife and the environment. This is why environmental agencies closely monitor their use.

Cross-contamination - plants bioengineered to produce pharmaceuticals (medicines etc) may contaminate food crops. Provisions have been introduced in the USA requiring substantial buffer zones, use of separate equipment and a rule that land used for such crops lie fallow for the next year.Ethical concernsConcerns about genetic modification include:
The possible monopolisation of the world food market by large multinational companies that control the distribution of GM seeds.

Using genes from animals in plant foods may pose ethical, philosophical or religious problems. For example, eating traces of genetic material from pork could be a problem for certain religious groups.

Animal welfare could be adversely affected. For example, cows given more potent GM growth hormones could suffer from health problems related to growth or metabolism.

New GM organisms could be patented so that life could become commercial property through patenting.GM labelling and the lawSince December 2002, the law in Australia states that food labels must show if food has been genetically modified or contains genetically modified ingredients, or whether GM additives or processing aids remain in the final food.
Special labels are not required for:

- ‘Highly refined’ foods where the altered DNA or protein is no longer in the food (for example, oil from modified corn).
- GM food additives or processing aids - unless the new DNA remains in the food to which it is added.
- GM flavours where less than 0.1 per cent is present in the food.
- Food, food ingredients or processing aids where GM ingredients are ‘unintentionally’ present in less than 1.0 per cent.
- Food that is prepared at the point of sale (so takeaway and restaurant food will not have to be labelled).
Labels may be required where:

- Genetic modification has altered the food so that its composition or nutritional value is ‘outside the normal range’ of similar non-GM goods; for example, if GM technology is used to add vitamins.
- Naturally occurring toxins are ‘significantly different’ to similar non-GM foods.

The food produced using GM technology contains a ‘new factor’, which can cause allergic reactions in some people.

Genetic modification raises ‘significant ethical, cultural and religious concerns’ regarding the origin of the genetic material used.
GM food on the shelves
Many foods on supermarket shelves contain imported GM ingredients. A variety of GM foods have also been approved for production in Australia. Current applications and approvals , FSANZ
These foods include corn, soybeans, potatoes and canola. Others are still undergoing field trials approved by the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR), although a recent moratorium by State Governments has stopped some field trials. Imported food products are subject to the same regulations as domestically manufactured foods.There are around 20 GM foods, additives, flavourings, growth hormone (bovine somatotropin) and enzymes (like rennet, used to make cheese) currently approved in Europe. In the USA, there are more than 40 approved GM foods. The main sources of GM foods in Australia include:

Imported soya from the United States. This is one of the main sources of GM ingredients in food sold in Australia since 1996. The soya has been genetically modified to be resistant to a herbicide. It can be found in a wide range of foods, such as chocolates, potato chips, margarine, mayonnaise, biscuits and bread. Cottonseed oil made from GM cotton (resistant to a pesticide) is also used in Australia. It is used for frying by the food industry, and in mayonnaise and salad dressings.

Imported GM corn is mainly used as cattle feed at present and has not been approved for farming in Australia. However, GM corn may have entered the Australian market through imported foods like breakfast cereal, bread, corn chips and gravy mixes; if so, it is now required to be labelled.

Other GM foods available overseas that may be ingredients in foods imported to Australia include potatoes, canola oil, sugar beet, yeast, cauliflower and coffee.

GM food

Definition of GM Food
Genetically Modified (GM) foods are produced from genetically modified organisms (GMO) which have had their genome altered through genetic engineering techniques. The general principle of producing a GMO is to insert DNA that has been taken from another organism and modified in the laboratory into an organism's genome to produce both new and useful traits or phenotypes. Typically this is done using DNA from certain types of bacteria

Genetically modified foods - Techniques

There are various techniques used to genetically modify foods. Food may be genetically modified to increase its shelf life, make it resistant to pesticides and insecticides, or improve the crop nutritional yield.
Genes are the blueprints for our bodies, governing factors such as growth and development. Within almost every cell of the body, genes are beaded along tightly bundled strands of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) called chromosomes, which are encased inside a special sac (nucleus).
Genes use chemical messages that instruct the cell to perform its functions by making proteins or enzymes.
By introducing a foreign gene, scientists prompt the altered organism to make new proteins or enzymes, so that the cell performs new functions. For example, the gene that helps a coldwater fish survive low temperatures can be inserted into a strawberry to make it frost-resistant. The genes can be taken from an animal, plant or micro-organism.
If the genes are inserted into another species, the resulting organism is referred to as transgenic.
A range of techniques
Some of the techniques used to transfer foreign cells into animals and plants include:

- Bacterial carriers
- Biolistics
- Calcium phosphate precipitation
- Electroporation
- Gene silencing
- Gene splicing
- Lipofection
- Microinjection
- Viral carriers.
Bacterial carriers
The bacterium Agrobacterium can infect plants, which makes it a suitable carrier for delivering DNA. The bacterium is prepared in a special solution to make its cell walls more porous. The selected gene is inserted into a bacterium extra chromosomal DNA molecule (called a plasmid) and dropped into the solution. The solution is heated, which allows the plasmid to enter the bacterium and express the new gene. The genetically altered bacterium (or recombinant) is allowed to recover (is ‘rested’) and grow and, depending on the plasmid, make extra copies of the new gene. The bacterium is then allowed to infect the target plant so it can deliver the plasmid and the new gene.
Biolistics
The selected DNA is attached to microscopic particles of gold or the metal tungsten. Like firing a gun, these DNA-laden particles are shot into the target cells using a burst of gas under pressure.
Calcium phosphate precipitation
The selected DNA is exposed to calcium phosphate. This mixture creates tiny granules. Target cells respond to these granules by surrounding and ingesting them (endoocytosis), allowing the granules to release the DNA and deliver it to the host nuclei and chromosome(s).
Electroporation
The prepared target cells are immersed in a special solution with the selected DNA. A short but intense electric shock is then passed through the solution. The result is small tears in the cell walls, which allow the new genetic material access to the nuclei. Then, the cells are placed into another solution and encouraged to repair their breached walls, locking the ‘donor’ DNA inside the cell. The selected DNA is incorporated into the host chromosomes to provide the host with a new gene.
Gene silencing
The gene responsible for the organism’s undesirable trait is identified. One method of ‘silencing’ that particular gene is to attach a second copy of the gene the wrong way around. This technique is used to prevent plants like peanuts and wheat from producing the proteins (allergens) commonly responsible for human allergies.
Gene splicing
Bacteria contain restriction enzymes that form part of the bacterium’s ‘immune system’ against invasion by another organism or bacteriophage (a bacterial virus). The restriction enzymes attack the foreign DNA by cutting it into precise sections and preventing it from being inserted into the bacterium’s chromosome. Different bacteria produce different restriction enzymes that cut any DNA at different places, making the DNA ‘sticky’ in some cases, which means they can be ‘pasted’ directly onto the target organism’s prepared DNA. Using these restriction enzymes from bacteria, molecular biologists can ‘genetically engineer’ the DNA for ‘insertion’ into target (host) cells to modify gene traits. The molecular biologist then uses another enzyme (ligase) to fuse the new gene into the chromosome. Alternatively, instead of ‘pasting’, the new gene may be inserted into a bacterium’s extra chromosomal DNA molecule (a plasmid), which carries invasion genes that allow it to invade the target cell and deliver the gene.
Lipofection
Small bubbles of fat called liposomes are used as the carriers of selected DNA. The target cells and the liposomes are placed into a special solution. The liposomes merge with the cell membrane, allowing the DNA into the cells for inclusion in the chromosome.
Microinjection
The selected DNA is injected into a fertilised ovum (female egg cell) through an extremely slender device called a glass capillary tube. The genetically modified egg is then transplanted into the prepared uterus of a receptive female and allowed to grow to term. This method ensures that almost every cell in the developing organism’s body contains the new DNA but not every progeny carries the transgene (is deemed a ‘transgenic’ animal).
Viral carriers
A virus that will invade the target cells but not cause damage or death is chosen. The selected DNA is added to the genetic makeup of the virus, and then the virus is allowed to infect the target. As the virus invades cells and replicates, the selected DNA is added to the target cells.
Examples of genetically modified foods
Some current examples include:

Crops are genetically engineered to be resistant to particular insect pests. For example, toxin genes (Bt toxin) from a bacterium found in soil (Bacillus thuringiensis) are inserted into the crop DNA so that the plants produce toxins specifically deadly to the larvae of their pest insects.

Soybeans have been genetically modified to resist herbicides that would normally kill them.

Plants are genetically modified to ensure longer shelf life or greater resistance to frost.

Farm animals (such as pigs, cows and chickens) are genetically modified for faster growth rates, leaner muscle-to-fat ratios or superior resistance to disease.

Plants are modified to yield higher protein or nutrient levels, or produce healthier oils containing ‘functional food’ components such as omega 3 fatty acids.

Genetically modified cows can produce milk that contains higher levels of bioactive milk proteins or human blood clotting components or a human breast milk component.

Monday, July 16, 2007

Environmental Issues

Environmental issues associated with the use of GM Food

As mentioned earlier, the gene of the Genetically Modified Food has been altered and does not occur naturally. Due to this reason, development of herbicide tolerant, viral resistance or insect resistance GM crops can be favorable to the environment. For a pest resistance GM crop, their pest resistance is achieved by incorporating a gene for toxin production from a bacterium into food plant. When GM crops are pest resistance, the usage of pesticide is reduced. A high usage of pesticide is likely to cause pollution of streams, rivers and wetlands when it rains. This pesticide would seep into the river with the rain and it might indirectly affect the marine wildlife. Growing GM food can help to prevent environmental damage by eliminating the application of chemical pesticides thus reducing the cost of bringing a crop to the market.

In addition, GM crops produce their own pesticide and protect the plant from yield loss. This could reduce the food shortage problem. Also, GM crop reduce the need to expand agricultural acreage. As a result, it would prevent deforestation from taking place. If deforestation was to occur, it could lead to the depletion of ozone layer which in turn would cause global warming.

On the other hand, GM food could also become a disaster to the environment. GM seed that is left behind after harvest may sprout and become weeds the following years. GM plants engineered for herbicide tolerance and weeds might cross-breed, resulting in the transfer of the herbicide resistance genes from the crops into the weeds causing the formation of superweeds, potentially disturbing the balance of nature. Furthermore, GM plants could also outcross with wild species resulting in superweeds that are more competitive and much more difficult to control. This would make weed management more complicated, expensive, labor and chemical intensive.

Unfortunately, GM crop plants could unintentionally harm other organisms by cross pollinating with non-engineered plants, introducing the new genes into wild plant population and ecosystem, thus causing detrimental chain effect on food web. For example, pollen from Bt (Bacillius thuringiensis) corn could be carried by the wind onto milkweed plants in neighboring fields, causing the caterpillar to consume the pollen and perish. If this was to continue, it can lead to the loss of biodiversity.

Sunday, July 1, 2007

Microbial Foodborne Pathogens

* Sorry figures & picture are not available. For figs click on LINK. Thanks! :)
Rapid Methods – Nucleic Acid Hybridization

1. Why use nucleic acid hybridization for detection of bacteria in foods?

Conventional methods for the selective growth & identification of significant microorganisms is based on culturing and isolation of the target microorganisms, possibly taking days to complete. The trend towards rapid methods is market driven: several days is too long to warehouse perishable commercial products for pathogen analysis; the cost in development of Nucleic acid and Immuno probes can represent a significant savings in storage and liability costs. There is a zero-tolerance standard for some pathogens (Salmonella & Listeria; even one-cell is not allowed per 25 gm sample). Also, it is signficantly more costly to recall product once it enters retail distribution compared to the ability to determine if food products contain pathogenic bacteria while still at hand. In addition, publicity attracted by an FDA- or USDA-mandated recall is costly to a company by potential loss of consumers.

The advancement of diagnostic abilities of nucleic acid technologies has shown promise in reducing the time required to make such determinations in foods. The time savings of many rapid methods is made by cutting into the time required for enrichment in conventional methods. Thus, rapidity means that detection is made with fewer numbers of cells- this is possible using nucleic acid or immuno probe technology.

Nucleic acid & immuno probes are not only beneficial to the commercial aspects of food industry, they also are very useful as diagnostic tools to aid in the understanding of dissemination of important DNA (virulence) sequences, mutations/changes in DNA sequences (are strains avirulent because they don't have genes for virulence, or do they have these sequences, but a mutation or otherwise is preventing expression of that characteristic?).

2. How is Nucleic Acid Hybridization Used?

In the most basic sense, nucleic acid hybridization utilizes the specific base pairing of nucleic acids (i.e., DNA) for their complementary sequence (i.e., DNA:DNA, RNA:DNA). The probe is labelled in some fashion and hybridized by any of several different methods to potential target DNA. Under stringent conditions the probe should ideally hybridize only to its target nucleic acid sequence. Depending of the method of labelling and the method of hybridization, detection of the probe (and therefore the target) via its label is attempted (Fig.1).

Types of hybridization/detection methods:

a) Hybridization in solution - Hybridization occurs in solution; detection can occur in solution too,
or after retaining the hybridized molecules onto filters.

b) Hybridization on filters - Hybridization can occur with target molecules initially bound onto nylon or nitrocellulose filters.

c) Hybridization in situ - Hybridization can occur in situ in tissues, or directly in agarose gels.

3. Target selection for nucleic acid hybridization

The choice of hybridization target (i.e., specific DNA, RNA, etc) depends on what you are wishing to detect. For instance, is the purpose to detect all members of a particular genus (i.e., all Salmonella), a particular species within a genus (i.e., Listeria monocytogenes but not other Listeria), or select strains within a given species (i.e., enterotoxigenic E. coli as opposed to non-toxigenic E. coli)? Therefore your choice of hybridization target will depend on the purpose intended of the hybridization assay.

What would you target in each of the three different purposes listed above?

Another factor to be considered is the copy per genome equivalent of the target molecule. A
chromosomal gene is normally expected to be found at one copy per cell. However, genes on
plasmids may be present in more than one copy depending on the copy-number of a particular
plasmid; similarly, ribosomal RNA targets are present in multiple copies within each cell.
In order to further increase the number of target molecules, one could include a strategy using a short period of either selective or nonselective enrichment to increase the number of (target)
microorganisms in the sample to be analyzed; this would indirectly increase the number of target molecules in the sample to be analyzed. Along similar lines, one could artificially increase the number of target molecules using a nucleic acid amplification scheme.

4. Selection and Labelling of Probes

A. Probes may consist of different types of molecules (need to be labelled before use):

1) Oligonucleotide probes - synthesized strands of nucleic acids which may range from 18-20
bases (i.e., 18-base oligomer, 18-mer) to 100 bases (100-mer). Single-stranded oligo probes,
obviously will only recognize (i.e., anneal) to one-half of the double-stranded target DNA. Also,
the shorter the probe, the greater the likelihood of non-specific hybridization reactions, that is,
binding to un-intended sites which randomly appear in the sequence of a target microorganisms'
DNA.

Labelled nucleotides can be incorporated during synthesis of the oligo probe. Labelling after
synthesis can be done at 5'-end (radiolabelling with phosphate) or at the 3'-end (with
radiolabelled/modified nucleotide triphosphates).

2) Cloned probes or gene fragments (double-stranded DNA) - plasmid clones, or isolated ds-
DNA fragments, may be used as probes. The non-essential portion of a plasmid vector
containing the probe may be used as long as the vector does not produce cross-reactions with
the target organisms, otherwise it would be necessary to isolate the particular DNA fragment
contained in the plasmid that may serve as a "probe."

Labelling of intact plasmid DNA can be done by nick translation, primer extension, or
photolabelling (biotin, digoxigenin). The efficiency of photolabelling is approximately one labe per 100-200 bases which would make it inefficent for short oligo probes. In nick translation, the
original DNA is labelled; in primer extension, new strands of labelled DNA are synthesized from
the original.

Large, linear ds-DNA fragments may also be labelled by nick translation, primer extension,
photolabelling, and 5'- and 3'-end labelling.

3) RNA probes - RNA can be transcribed from DNA in vitro, thereby generating large numbers of probe molecules. Labelling can be done during synthesis by supplying the appropriate labelled
nucleotide triphosphates or afterwards using photolabelling, etc.

B. Labels for Nucleic Acid Probes:

1. Radiolabels - (32P, 35S, 3H, etc.)

Radiolabels are usually incorporated into nucleic acids in the form of radionucleotides. The
radionucleotide triphosphate (dNTP) is either used to add a phosphate (-32P at 5' end) group or
a nucleotide monophosphate (-32P-dNMP at 3' end).
Advantages of radiolabels - high sensitivity of detection(can detect 0.1 pg DNA).
Disadvantage - short half-life of the nucleotide and the obvious problem of using radioactive
agents (handling, storage, disposal; prohibits use by nontechnical workers).

2. Modified Nucleotide Triphosphates

Modified nucleotide triphosphates have been developed which have a modifying group attached
to the base. Having the labelling group attached to the base means that the method of labelling
must be one which adds a nucleotide, e.g., a synthesizing RXN (Nick Translation, Primer Extension).

i) Affinity - Biotinylated dNTP's (Biotin-dUTP). Avidin is a protein isolated from either egg white (egg white avidin) or from culture filtrates of Streptomyces avidinii (streptavidin). Avidin exhibits high affinity binding for biotin (Kd=10-15M). Avidin has been conjugated with either alkaline phosphatase (AP) or horseradish peroxidase (HRP). The avidin-enzyme conjugates are used to bind to the hybridized biotinylated DNA probe. Reaction of AP with the added dyes, NBT and BCIP, causes the production of an insoluble blue precipitate on a filter membrane. Alkaline phosphatase also reacts with chemiluminescent substrates which produces a
chemiluminescent reaction, emitting light, which can be detected with X-ray film.

ii) Immuno - Alternately, dNTP's can be conjugated with groups (digoxigenin; dNTP-dig) to which antibodies have been made. Therefore, anti-dig conjugated enzymes (Abdig-AP; Abdig-HRP) may be used to initiate a visualizing reaction wherever the dig-labelled probe is hybridized. Alkaline phosphatase may be used to produce either a chemiluminescent or colorimetric RXN.

3. Photoactivated labels

Photoactivated biotin and photoactivated digoxigenin can be bound to a DNA probe simply by
adding the DNA probe with the photoactivated biotin or dig and shining a light to cause a
crosslinking reaction. The probe is used to hybridize to its target, and the same conjugated
enzymes mentioned above (avidin-AP or Antidig-AP) can be used for visualization. Potency of
labelled probes - depends on the degree of labelling, since target detection depends on the
number of labels bound to the target sequence. For instance, end-labelled probes may contain
only one label per probe molecule. Since nick translation will replace a short stretch of 10-15
bases, a labelled nucleotide may be introduced several times within the stretch being repaired.
However, primer extension may synthesize a stretch of DNA as long as 600 bases within which
there is opportunity to introduce many labels within one strand of synthesized probe.

5. Hybridization of Nucleic Acids

A. Structure & biochemistry (see lecture 4)
The 2 polynucleotide strands of DNA are antiparallel; by convention, the DNA sequences are written
5' -> 3' with the 5'-P terminus at the left: P-5'-ATCGCG-3'-OH.
The helical structure of DNA (native state) is maintained by base stacking between adjacent bases and by hydrogen bonding between bases in opposite strands.

B. Factors affecting DNA denaturation

The 2 strands of DNA can be separated (denatured) by heat, high pH (pH 11.3), and low ionic
strength. Nucleic acids absorb light strongly at 260 nm; single stranded DNA has more absorbance than an equivalent amount of double stranded DNA because of a change in the electron systems of the bases in the stacked vs. unstacked form.

Tm= melting temperature at which denaturation is 50%.
Tm is dependent on ionic strength, base composition, and the presence of denaturing agents.
For instance:
i) Tm increases with increase in %GC composition due to 3 vs. 2 H-bonds for G:C.
ii) Tm increases as the ionic strength increases (0.15 - 0.5 M NaCl eliminates electrostatic repulsion between phosphate backbone of DNA strands).
iii) Tm is lowered by helix destabilizing reagents such as formamide which compete with bases for formation of H-bonds.

C. Factors Affecting the Rate of Denaturation

Concentration of probe - rate of hybridization to the filter and the amount of hybrids formed
increases with increasing concentration of the probe in solution.
Ionic strength (salt concentration) - at low ionic strength, hybridization occurs slowly, but as ionic strength increases (up to 1.5 M) so does the reaction rate. However, high salt concentrations stabilize mismatched duplexes.

Temperature - must be high enough to disrupt random intra- and inter-strand H-bonds that form, but low enough to allow renaturation (20-25oC below Tm).

D. Stringency of Hybridization Conditions

The discrimination of identical vs. mismatched sequences can be minimized by increasing
the stringency of hybridization. Hybridization conditions can be set which allow for
formation of hybrids with a high degree of mismatching (low stringency) or allow only
well-matched hybrids to form (high stringency). Low salt concentrations, high formamide concentrations, and high temperature favor formation of well-matched hybrids (high stringency).

6. Hybridization Strategies

Hybridization reactions can occur in either solid phase (on solid supports, i.e., filters) or in liquid
phase (i.e., in liquid). Solid phase, or filter, hybridization for detection of foodborne microorganisms is usually in the form of dot- or slot-blots, or with colony blots. In dot/slot blots,
bacterial cultures are lysed, releasing their DNA/RNA, and this solution is filtered through a
template of wells (i.e., dots) or slots. The nucleic acids are then trapped onto the nylon or
nitrocellulose filter which is then used in hybridization reactions; this gives a yes or no answer to the particular sample. Colony lifts are done by either placing filters down onto agar plates before plating a sample, or first plating a sample and picking up the colonies (i.e., colony lift) by placing a round filter onto the agar surface and picking it back up - the colonies will stick to the filter where they are lysed in situ and the filter is then used in hybridization reactions. These methods, however, are subject to high background signals that interfere with the probe signal.
Improved solid phase methods include:

Sandwich hybridization assay (Fig. 3).

Sandwich hybridization assay which involves a 3-component assay including a capture probe,
the target sequence (from the sample to be assayed), and a signal-generating probe (Fig. 3).
The denatured target sequence (sample) is retained during hybridization by the capture
probe (bound to the solid phase support) and the signal probe is then added and hybridizes to an
alternate sequence on the target that is not involved with binding to the capture probe. This
can be considered a double capture: once for the target, and a second time for the signal probe.
Strand-displacement assay (Fig. 4).
A next generation modification of the sandwich assay is
the strand-displacement assay (Fig. 4). This assay also involves a capture probe to which is
hybridized a signal probe that has been made to have some degree of mismatching and is
therefore weakly hybridized to the capture probe.
When a target sequence of 100% identity to the capture probe is hybridized, it displaces the wealy bound signal probe. Detection of target sequence is obtained by a decrease or absence of signal.

Dipstick assay (Fig. 5).
Another variation of the solid-phase assay is the dipstick assay (Fig. 5). This assay is nearly
identical to the sandwich assay described earlier (Fig. 3). However, in the dipstick assay hybridization occurs in solution and the capture probe is not directly attached to
a solid support. Rather, one end of the capture probe is for "capturing" the target sequence while the other end is for attachment by hybridization to complementary sequences attached to a dipstick. The signal also binds to the target sequence (captured), however, detection is
made by means of an antibody-enzyme conjugate that recognizes the signal label. Other hybridization strategies have also made use of magnetic bead technology. The capture probe can be attached to magnetic beads which are allowed to hybridize with potential target molecules.
The capture:target hybrids are removed from solution by magnetic recovery; addition of a signal probe and subsequent washing and signal development provides a detection signal.

7. Amplification Methods

Even with all the sensitiviy of DNA probes, one of the major obstacles is when there occurs only a few target cells against a high background of other organisms and food debri. One method of improving the chances for target detection is by amplification.

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

PCR is a method which has gained tremendous popularity for its ability to detect low levels of DNA sequences. Many of the advances in biotechnology/molecular biology come from a simple understanding of the mechanics of the various reactions involved with DNA synthesis/ degradation. PCR is simply a repetition of primer extension reactions (Fig. 6). Two synthetic primers made to complementary sequences of target DNA are annealed to denatured target DNA. Taq polymerase isolated from Thermus aquaticus, an organism capable of tolerating high thermal temperatures, is used instead of DNA polymerase. What this does is allow high temperatures to be reached without denaturing the polymerase enzyme. Primer extension (strand synthesis) is carried out at moderately high temperatures as well (~55oC), the two facing primers are extended, the temperature is raised to ~95oC to dislodge the extended strands, the temperature is then lowered and new primers (in excess) reanneal and repeat the strand extension process.

The thermal stability of Taq polymerase provides 3 advantages:

a) Faster RXN rate of synthesis

b) Prevents ssDNA from selfannealling

c) Allows the repetitive denaturing of DNA without denaturing the polymerase.

The strands that are synthesized and extended can also act as template for the primers, thereby exponentially increasing the synthesis of the target sequences and thereby facilitating the amplification. The novelty/utility in PCR is the ability to amplify sequences by a factor of up to 105-fold.

Primer Development Strategy:

Primer Tm. One aspect of primer development is to insure the two primers have similar Tm. At
any given temperature, you would want both primers to have similar potential for hybridization which would not occur if they had vastly different Tm’s. Software programs can now select primers for nearly the same Tm. Primer Self-hybridization. Also, primers should not have excessive cross hybridization with themselves or the other primer. This would prevent the primers from hybridizing efficiently to their target. If primers were to self-overlap, you could also get primer-dimers to develop upon PCR reactions. Software programs can also determine if this will likely occur.


Q-beta Replicase Amplification:

This method is again a double-capture hybridization assay (Fig. 7). Denatured target sequence is captured by immobilized capture probe. An RNA probe (MDV-1) is then added which can also
recognize the target sequence. The immobilized mixture is then washed and unbound RNA probe is washed away except for that retained by the captured target sequence. The target-RNA probe is then selectively eluted and an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (Q-beta replicase) is added. The Q-beta polymerase synthesizes RNA transcripts from RNA
(the one used as the probe & stuck to the target). Amplification occurs very rapidly to give amplification levels of up to 109-fold.

Ligase Amplification Reaction (LAR):

LAR is similar, yet different, than PCR. Instead of synthesizing new strands of DNA as in PCR, LAR relies on the use of adjacent annealing oligonuclceotides (Fig. 8). When they hybridize next
to each other on target sequence, they can be ligated together by the enzyme, T4 DNA ligase. The same thing happens on the opposite strand (therefore, you actually need 4 oligos). The
newly ligated oligos can then act as template for the hybridization of the two complementary
oligos, and so on, etc. This technique can give up to 106-fold amplification of target sequence.
Self-Sustained Sequence Replication (3SR)

3SR is an attempt to get away from thermal cycling because Cetus had patented the PCR process (now sold the patent to Hoffman- LaRoche) and anyone who uses the process,
commercially, has to pay royalties. 3SR makes use of a combination of reverse transcriptase
(makes DNA from RNA), RNA polymerase (makes RNA from DNA), and RNase H (degrades RNA when hybridized to DNA) (Fig. 9). In this process, RNA targets are degraded
and result in an accumulation (amplification) of DNA. Reverse transcriptase is a DNA
polymerase that can synthesize a complementary copy of DNA from a single strand of RNA, DNA, or an RNA:DNA hybrid.
The result of using Reverse Transcriptase in the 3SR assay would be double stranded DNA from
the original single stranded RNA target.

Steps:

1. Primers for the RNA target are added that initiate synthesis of DNA from the RNA by reverse transcriptase.
2. RNase H (Rev. Transcript.) is added which degrades the RNA in an RNA:DNA hybrid.
3. A second primer is added which allows synthesis of a complementary strand of DNA (dsDNA) from the remaining DNA of the DNA:RNA hybrid.
4. The double-stranded DNA can then be assayed, or used to further amplification by:
5. Addition of primers with RNA polym. binding site, and the use of RNA polymerase to
transcribe an RNA copy (both directions). RNA doesn't need a priming site as in
DNAsynthesis, but it does need an RNA polymerase binding site.

6. After transcriptional replication of the RNA strands, DNA amplification from these strands
will continue just as in Step 1.

Fluorogenic PCR Assays for Rapid and Real-Time PCR.
The Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) permits the rapid amplification of specific DNA sequences by a factor of up to 107 (Border et al., 1990). The sensitivity of PCR is typically compared to the detection of a single bacterium. Although carrying out the PCR involves initial optimization, these efforts are more than justified by the sensitivity and the wide dynamic range of the technique. During the past 10 years PCR has been used to detect foodborne pathogens from various food products such as milk, cheese, eggs, meat and meat products, fish and fish
6 products. Analysis of the PCR product has usually been done using ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels. However, the use of fluorogenic probes that generate a fluorescent signal can eliminate the need to run agarose gels for PCR analyses such that automation of pathogen detection may be applied more easily in the food processing industry.

Hybridization probes.
The Light Cycler™ can also use hybridization probes for more specific detection of the product (De Silva et al. 1998). The Light Cycler™ uses the concept of Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) wherein fluorescence energy transfer occurs between two adjacent
fluorophores (De Silva et al. 1998) (Fig.12). The probes are designed such that they are specific to an internal sequence within the target. The 3’ end of one probe is labeled with a donor fluorophore (fluorescein) and the 5’ end of the adjacent probe is labeled with an acceptor fluorophore (LC Red 640) (Bernard et al. 1999). In order to prevent the extension of the probe
labelled with LC Red 640, its 3’ end is blocked by dephopsphorylation. The Tm of the probes should be 5.0 0C to 10.0 0C higher than the Tm of the primers (Bernard et al. 1999). The donor fluorophore absorbs light from the blue light-emitting diode (LED) of the Light Cycler™ instrument, the resonance energy from this fluorophore is absorbed by the adjacent acceptor fluorophore and the fluorescence emitted by it is detected and measured (De Silva et al. 1998). This energy transfer occurs only when the two probes are in close proximity (i.e bound to the target). The FRET signal increases with each thermal cycle and is proportional to the amount of specific PCR product available for hybridization (De Silva et al. 1998). Though the sensitivity of the technique is high the method requires designing, synthesis and optimization of the hybridization probes in addition to the optimization of the PCR.
Link: Good info

Free cursors for MySpace at www.totallyfreecursors.com!